Why I Don't Follow a Protocol

Recently I worked with two different individuals, each of whom had eyesight issues they wished to focus on. (Unintended pun). In the first case the person had found herself referring to "something I didn't see" in relation to ancestors. As we explored further, it turned out that there were roots to the issue seven generations back on both her mother's and her father's side of the family. Most of us living in the United States know little about our parents' grandparents' circumstances. Still, over and over again, in my office we discover that issues that remained unresolved in the lives of distant relatives can easily affect the energies of the present generation.

The magic of energy work is that with intention such things can be addressed and resolved using modalities like Tapas Acupressure Technique, Emotional Freedom Technique, Be Set Free Fast and others without ever knowing the details of a past traumatic episode. In this case we were able to do so using eye movement to access the areas in question, combined with the Be Set Free Fast cue word to transform stuck energy. It turned out that energy derived from the mother's branch of the family was accessed by moving the eyes in an orbit in one direction from the top center, while energy derived from the father's branch of the family was located by moving the eyes in the opposite direction. But I wouldn't even use that distinction to make a future protocol without considerably more evidence that such a rule could be extrapolated from working with numerous individuals on similar issues.

The second person's situation turned out to require a different approach. Of course, it is possible that she would have had some gains had we applied the same methodology that brought results for the first individual. I'd need many more experimental subjects before I could draw any conclusions. Still, I was guided to work with the second individual in a very different manner. It turned out that her preferred sensory mode is visual, and that she holds a strong vision for social and political justice. She doesn't like what she sees. We uncovered a belief that goes something like, "if others don't see things my way, I don't want to see either."

In her case there was also a relationship between seeing and being seen. In order to do the work she wants to do before the mainstream is able to accept these cutting edge approaches, she needs to be able to reach the population that needs her services without being seen as a threat by the authorities. As if to affirm the direction these metaphors were taking us, a fox appeared in her yard just as this information surfaced. Animal Speaks describes the fox as totem as representing invisibility and cunning among other attributes. In addition, a need to integrate "vision" on the physical, emotional, psychological, social, political, and spiritual levels presented itself. In other words, blockages to vision were manifesting symbolically at the physical level, but they were not actually physical problems. These realms were revealing an underlying structure where distinct realms overlapped merely to bring attention to the issues at hand.

In this second instance the preferred modality provided the best access through the individual's beliefs, thoughts, and ideas, while in the first instance, access to past generations was gained by working directly with subtle energy which was found by working with eye movement.